Tektome · Multi Intelligence Platform

Sign your next submission with the evidence in hand. record behind it. citation attached.

Tektome reviews the whole package against statute, the client brief and your own standards, puts the risk in view with the citation behind every finding, and produces the documented review your renewal already asks for.

Schedule a demo Explore more

solutions

6+

use cases to explore

AEC

domain knowledge, built in

What Tektome is

The assurance layer for the whole scheme.

For firms that carry statutory liability for what their construction records show, Tektome reads the whole package against every requirement it has to satisfy, puts the risk in view with the evidence behind it, and holds that record for as long as the duty lasts.

  1. Linked

    The connected record.

    Requirements, standards, precedents and decisions linked to the work that satisfies them. Not a filing system: a record only your firm holds.

  2. Yours

    Your requirements, not just published codes.

    House standards, Employer's Requirements, client briefs, planning conditions and the commitments made in minutes and correspondence, reviewed alongside statute.

  3. Unseen

    Blind spots as a first-class output.

    The requirements nothing has been reviewed against, surfaced as a ranked list before sign-off. A rule-based tool stays silent where it holds no rule.

WHAT PROBLEM WE SOLVE

You can describe your review process. 
Evidencing it is the hard part.

A Principal Designer or Principal Contractor duty runs for as long as the liability does, and it is answered by whoever can produce the record. Insurers, adjudicators and regulators all ask the same question, and they ask it years after the project team has moved on.

Almost none of that exposure comes from bad building. It comes from information: a requirement nobody carried forward, a change nobody logged, a review nobody recorded.

Our mission

To empower AEC firms to build with confidence
and to show the evidence for it.

  • 48%

    of all rework traced to poor project information and miscommunication, rather than to workmanship on site.

    Source

    FMI / PlanGrid, Construction Disconnected · survey of 599 industry leaders across the US, UK, Canada, Australia and New Zealand

  • 86%nine in ten

    of large projects exceed their budget, by an average of 28% against the figure they were approved on.

    Source

    Flyvbjerg, Holm & Buhl · 258 large transport infrastructure projects across 20 countries; measures cost overrun, not schedule

  • £31bnevery year, in the US alone

    the annual cost of rework driven by bad data and miscommunication, in one market.

    Source

    FMI estimate, Construction Disconnected · $17bn from poor communication and $14.3bn from poor project data

THE EVIDENCE

A process you can show, not a memory you have to defend.

Every requirement is linked to its source, and every review, decision and sign-off is recorded: who examined what, when, why it was accepted, and what was left to human judgement. Where the evidence does not settle a finding, it is referred to a named person and recorded as such. The record holds for as long as the duty lasts, and it is still there long after the people who signed have gone.

Reports, packs and submissions are produced by running the review, not rebuilt by hand, so the pack you present and the record you rely on afterwards are the same object.

Audit trail · REQ-1184 steps

  1. Requirement captured

    Company standard §12 · 4 Mar

  2. Reviewed against revision B

    Model and 6 sheets · 19 Jun

  3. Confidence too low to settle

    Referred to the building fabric consultant · 2 Aug

  4. Accepted, with a condition recorded

    A. Rowe, building fabric consultant · 8 Aug

INSTITUTIONAL KNOWLEDGE

Every review leaves the judgement behind, so the next scheme starts further forward.

A project team disperses at handover and takes what it learned with it. A firm cannot rehire that. When every review leaves its judgement behind in a form the next team starts from, the baseline moves rather than resetting.

1st

2nd

3rd

4th

Scheme

Scheme

Scheme

Scheme

  • Where every scheme starts, with no record behind it
  • Accumulated judgement carried in from earlier schemes

Where the judgement sits

Held in people

It leaves when they do.

The reasoning behind a decision, and the standard that was really applied, go with the team that dispersed.

Held in the record

It stays when they do not.

Linked to the requirement it applies to, so the next team meets it in the review rather than in an archive.

Use cases

Every review. One connected record.

Every review feeds the same consolidated position per scheme, so risk that sits between two review types stops being the risk nobody owns.

01 · Risk & review coverage

Coverage · 3,400 requirements

  • Reviewed and met
  • Reviewed, not met
  • Not yet reviewable
  • Never reviewed

A status against every requirement

Managing Partner · General Counsel

Explore more

02 · Compliance & code review

Compliance position · rev C

AD B · C1Flat entrance doors
AD B · 3.1Travel distance
AD M · 3.11WC access zone

Live status per requirement

Technical Director · Technical Excellence

Explore more

03 · Coordination validation

Disciplines and interfaces

Structure42

Riser clear width

Mechanical67

Reviewed against each other

Design Manager · BIM Coordinator

Explore more

04 · Deliverables & information delivery

Due against forecast

Structural
Facade spec
Acoustic

Tracked against brief and EIR

Project Controls · Development Director

Explore more

05 · Commercial & change control

Variation register · stage 4

Cladding build-up revised£84,200
Reception finish upgradedUnlogged
Stair pressurisationUnlogged

Tested before sign-off

Commercial Director · Contracts Manager

Explore more

06 · Design maturity & stage readiness

Gate · fix the contract sum

Gate requires
  • 212settled
  • 74still open
  • 54too early
  • ApprovalReady
  • Tender31 open
  • Contract sum74 open
  • ConstructionToo early

62% settled against the 78% this gate requires

Hold · 74 items

Commit with the gaps visible

Development Director · Finance Director

Explore more

Built on more than 50 review templates, extended with your firm's own requirements, workflows and standards.

Resources

Guides, research, and field notes.

Next step

Interested to learn more?

A 30-minute session: a deeper look at the platform, and a conversation about the schemes and duties your firm is carrying. Nothing to set up, no project data needed.

  • The review running end to end, on a real scheme
  • A walkthrough on a project we have prepared
  • Live Q&A with our engineering team

Book a 30-minute intro

By submitting, you agree to be contacted about your intro session. We never share your details.

Your project data stays yours, and it is never used to train shared models. On a pilot engagement, everything is deleted at close.

Tektome reads from the document systems your teams already work in, including Box and SharePoint. No migration, no parallel filing.